“Thakore directed the finance division to make sure that the corporate foots the invoice. This was simply one of many situations the place he used his affect to manage how issues are performed at Daimler Monetary,” stated one amongst a number of individuals who have come ahead with details about a slew of improprieties on the non-banking monetary firm (NBFC).
Any wrongdoing associated to the get together, nevertheless, pales compared to different questionable actions on the lender which might be progressively coming to mild. A few of these actions have now drawn the eye of the Reserve Financial institution of India (RBI).
In Could, the RBI imposed a penalty of ₹5 lakh on Daimler Monetary Providers for failing to promptly report a fraud. Home NBFCs are mandated to report fraudulent transactions to the regulator inside 15-21 days of the criminality being found, relying on the quantum of loans concerned.
Established in 2011, Daimler Monetary Providers is the captive financier of Stuttgart-headquartered Daimler. The lender gives loans in two broad classes—to Mercedes sellers, and to prospects. Within the first class, Daimler Monetary extends loans to sellers for his or her showrooms, workshop gear, working capital and so forth. It’s on this section that the corporate finds itself mired in a foul mortgage mess, which for lengthy had been brushed beneath the carpet and has left a gap in its steadiness sheet.
Daimler Monetary Providers’ mortgage guide stood at ₹6,600 crore as on 31 March 2021 (newest accessible determine) and it reported a web lack of ₹140 crore in 2020-21. The corporate’s web non-performing property (NPA) ratio stood at 17.5% in FY21, up from 15.3% the earlier monetary yr.
Mint spoke to various insiders to determine why the lender had been penalized by the RBI. Whereas it isn’t clear which particular incidents Daimler Monetary Providers has been pulled up for, the sources Mint spoke to revealed a disturbing sample.
Senior firm insiders had alerted the worldwide mother or father to questionable transactions that happened when Thakore was the chief danger officer and the chief government. Amongst different issues, these transgressions included refusal to take motion towards defaulters, evergreening of loans and deploying credit score merchandise not accredited by the corporate. The international mother or father had been made privy to these goings-on way back to 2018, in line with an individual aware of the event who spoke on the situation of anonymity.
In a single embarrassing flip of occasions, the corporate discovered itself in a authorized tangle after one of many defaulters filed police instances towards its senior officers. This occurred after Daimler Monetary Providers lastly acted to get well loans that have been due however reportedly made a multitude of the job (extra on this later).
An e mail despatched to Thakore in search of responses to the allegations made towards him stays unanswered. He additionally didn’t reply to a textual content message in search of remark.
The allegations
Thakore began his profession at Daimler in 2000 as a fleet analyst within the US. Thereafter, he took up a number of managerial roles within the truck credit score administration division of the monetary providers arm. Thakore’s LinkedIn profile reveals that between October 2010 and January 2018, he was the chief danger officer. A whistleblower alleges that among the NBFC’s delinquent loans originated throughout that interval. In February 2018, Thakore moved to Singapore as vice-president (key account administration, regional credit score operations) earlier than coming again to India in October 2020 because the managing director. In September 2021, he grew to become the CFO of Daimler India Industrial Automobiles, the trucking division.
The largest allegations: when Thakore headed the NBFC, the corporate prolonged undue favours to 2 Mercedes sellers: the Kolhapur, Maharashtra-based Ghatge group, which owns Ghatge Motors and KGP Auto; and the Ahmedabad, Gujarat-registered Emerald Luxurious Automobiles.
The loans to the Ghatges have been allegedly evergreened whereas Emerald acquired loans towards little collateral (Emerald denies this).
Evergreening is a observe by which monetary establishments try to revive a burdened mortgage by permitting a defaulting borrower to borrow extra money to repay prior dues. Consultants say it is likely one of the largest challenges bedevilling the monetary sector.
“This has led to large money owed piling up with the debtors, who clearly don’t have any capability to repay— one thing the lending establishment is conscious of. Consequently, this ends in a scenario the place giant quantities of financial institution debt stay unpaid,” stated Bharat Chugh, a Supreme Courtroom advocate.
Ghatge group defaults
Like different sellers, the Ghatge firms had additionally taken stock loans from Daimler Monetary. Loans for stock are given with the automobiles as collateral. These loans and gear finance loans at the moment are in default.
A number of makes an attempt have been allegedly made to evergreen these dues. Daimler Monetary even prolonged private loans of ₹6 crore to the promoters, permitting them to quickly remedy their default, insiders allege. Even when Daimler Monetary had a private mortgage product, which it doesn’t, this most likely wouldn’t be kosher.
Ghatge group just lately proposed to settle its dues by repaying 30% of the whole excellent quantity, stated one insider. Entrepreneurs Satish, Mohan and Gaurav Ghatge are administrators on the boards of those two firms. An e mail despatched to Satish Ghatge stays unanswered.
Someday final yr, Daimler Monetary lastly determined to start out restoration of loans given to the group. The lender tried to encash some cheques drawn by the promoters and used as safety for loans. The cheque bounced and the non-bank lender determined to pursue authorized motion towards the borrower beneath Part 138 of The Negotiable Devices Act, which applies to dishonoured cheques. Nevertheless, it turned out that Daimler Monetary had tried to encash cheques used as safety for a mortgage that had already been repaid and never associated to the mortgage in default. The restoration tactic boomeranged.
On 27 February, the Ghatges filed two first info studies (FIRs) in Shahupuri Police Station in Kolhapur towards the administrators and different senior officers of Daimler Monetary Providers. Mint has seen a duplicate of the police complaints. The FIRs title Brendon Sissing (managing director and CEO), Harish Chand Jain (chief monetary officer), Ingo Krueger (head of credit score and danger administration), Latha Venkatesh (chief info officer), Anita Iyer (firm secretary) and Madan Gopal Bharadwaj (head of wholesale credit score). Based on one of many individuals who revealed particulars of the case, the administrators and others named within the report have taken anticipatory bail.
Following the police studies, Daimler Monetary approached the Bombay Excessive Courtroom, with senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi arguing on its behalf. On 1 July, the excessive courtroom known as for mediation within the case and justice S.J. Kathawalla, a retired choose of the Bombay Excessive Courtroom, was requested to behave because the mediator. Individually, final December, Daimler Monetary filed 4 petitions with the Mumbai bench of the Nationwide Firm Regulation Tribunal (NCLT) towards the Ghatges beneath the Insolvency and Chapter Code.
After reporting losses of ₹19.9 crore in FY20, Ghatge Motors made a revenue of ₹12.06 crore in FY21, information from regulatory filings by the corporate reveals.
Earlier this yr, the corporate’s auditors resigned, citing delays in sharing monetary statements. On 28 February, Abhijeet Bhagwat, a companion at chartered accounting agency PG Bhagwat LLP, despatched a resignation letter to the board of administrators of Ghatge Motors. Based on the resignation letter, in 2020-21, there was appreciable delay in offering monetary statements and different particulars required to finish the audit.
“There may be insufficient workers accessible within the accounts division….we’ve got needed to spent (sic) appreciable man days on this audit. We had requested the administration for 50% hike within the audit charges of ₹350,000 to align with our audit efforts, which until date haven’t been accepted nor confirmed,” acknowledged the letter, a duplicate of which has been reviewed by Mint.
After PG Bhagwat resigned, Ghatge Motors appointed Mahesh Kurhade and Firm as its auditor. The corporate’s excellent dues to Daimler Monetary Providers stood at ₹26.34 crore as on 28 August 2020, the corporate’s new auditors acknowledged within the FY21 annual monetary assertion. “…the corporate has not defaulted in compensation of dues to a monetary establishment, financial institution, and authorities besides in case of loans for automobile stock funding and gear funding from Daimler Monetary Providers,” the brand new auditors stated.
A spokesperson for Daimler Monetary Providers stated in an announcement that because the Ghatge case is sub-judice “please perceive that as a matter of precept we don’t touch upon pending authorized instances.”
In an identical assertion, Daimler India Industrial Automobiles stated: “Please perceive that as a matter of coverage, we don’t touch upon hypothesis, ongoing investigations or open authorized instances.”
Emerald Luxurious defaults
In January 2020, senior executives of Daimler Monetary Providers India urged Thakore to approve motion towards Mercedes seller Emerald Luxurious Automobiles for not repaying its dues on time.
“Thakore and the seller had a number of in-person and telephonic conferences when the seller was in default. The native administration, together with crew leaders, had urged authorized motion nevertheless it was delayed on some pretext or different,” stated an insider who didn’t need to be recognized.
The corporate solely acted after six months, in July 2020, recalling the whole mortgage of ₹64 crore.
Unable to repay the mortgage as soon as it was recalled in July 2020, Emerald offered the dealership to a different Mercedes seller that November, based mostly on a tripartite settlement it inked with Daimler Monetary and the second seller.
Even after the sale, disputes cropped up between Emerald and Daimler on overdue mortgage repayments. In 2021, Daimler Monetary filed an arbitration case within the Madras Excessive Courtroom towards Emerald Luxurious Automobiles, and two of its administrators: Kanaiyo Thakkar and Khushi Thakkar.
The Excessive Courtroom order issued on 13 August 2021 confirmed that Emerald had knowledgeable the courtroom that gross sales at each its showrooms—in Ahmedabad and Surat—and work at its service stations got here to a halt through the covid-19 lockdown of March 2020. Based on Emerald, whereas the loans have been purported to be paid over a number of years, the mortgage recall triggered financial duress, forcing it to promote the property to a different seller.
“I particularly deny that there was any favouritism to me or Emerald; reasonably we have been the sufferer,” Kanaiyo Thakkar asserted in an emailed response to Mint.
He added that Emerald was awarded a Mercedes Benz dealership in 2017 and the automaker insisted the corporate take loans solely from Daimler Monetary. Thakkar additionally stated the lender supplied finance towards property, and “took big collateral over and above property, at (a) excessive price of curiosity, a lot greater than Indian banks”.
Head within the sand
In early 2018, after Thakore moved to Singapore in his new function throughout the firm, he was changed by Asmaa Jamil, who was earlier posted in Singapore. It was Jamil who discovered in regards to the two defaulting accounts, say firm insiders.
“She escalated the matter to her seniors overseas and it led to a couple inside enquiries as nicely. However, it didn’t result in something substantial,” stated one of many individuals cited above.
The problems at Daimler Finance have put the highlight again on lenders and particular people attempting to kick the NPA can down the highway. Mortgage frauds by some debtors are additionally a pertinent subject within the context of the Indian monetary system. Though such frauds happen at each banks in addition to non-bank lenders, conversations largely focus solely on the big defaults perpetrated on banks.
“Though reforms by the RBI have bridged the regulatory hole between NBFCs and industrial banks, solely time will inform whether or not these measures are ample to plug the gaps exploited by unscrupulous fraudulent debtors,” stated Sanket Jain, companion at legislation agency Pioneer Authorized.
Obtain The Mint Information App to get Every day Market Updates & Reside Enterprise Information.
