Earlier this 12 months, we wrote that the Shopper Monetary Safety Bureau (CFPB) was signaling a not-so-quiet transition to aggressive compliance actions in 2022 after an prolonged interval of flexibility through the COVID-19 pandemic (hyperlink). The Honest Credit score Reporting Act (FCRA) is one in all many shopper monetary legal guidelines which have been straight within the CFPB’s cross-hairs through the first-half of 2022. In a collection of amicus briefs, advisory opinions, and interpretive guidelines, the CFPB has communicated new positions that considerably elevate the bar for FCRA compliance and restrict state-law preemption, even going so far as to take positions that contradict long-standing judicial precedent. These ongoing developments might be price monitoring as we proceed into the second-half of 2022 and past.

The CFPB

The CFPB is a federal company created in 2010 that’s liable for shopper safety within the monetary sector. On this capability, the CFPB regulates banks, mortgage lenders, mortgage and mortgage servicers, credit score reporting companies, and debt collectors by, amongst different issues, rulemaking, casual written steerage, and investigating shopper complaints.

The FCRA

The FCRA was enacted by Congress in 1970 to, amongst different issues, guarantee “truthful and correct credit score reporting” that’s “important to the continued functioning of the banking system.”  See 15 U.S.C. § 1681(a)(1). The FCRA imposes obligations on furnishers of credit score data (Part 1681s-2), customers of credit score data (Sections 1681b and 1681m), and shopper reporting companies (Sections 1681b, 1681c, 1681e, and 1681i).

The CFPB’s Steerage in 2022

To this point in 2022, the CFPB has taken the next positions with regard to the FCRA:

• Investigations of “Authorized” Disputes. In an amicus temporary filed within the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in April (hyperlink), the CFPB took the place that furnishers are required by Part 1681s-2 of the FCRA to research credit score reporting disputes elevating “authorized” questions (as an example, whether or not the borrower owes a debt). This place conflicts with an extended line of federal court docket precedent holding that furnishers are required to research solely disputes of factual inaccuracy. In help of its place (which reiterated an identical place taken in an amicus temporary in 2021), the CFPB argued that the prior precedent was “incorrectly determined” as a result of (a) the FCRA textual content doesn’t distinguish between authorized and factual disputes, (b) furnishers of credit score data (similar to mortgage servicers) are ready to evaluate authorized questions, and (c) as a sensible matter, it may be tough to attract the road between factual and authorized questions. It stays to be seen if the Eleventh Circuit will undertake the CFPB’s place. Nonetheless, even when the CFPB’s place is rejected by the Eleventh Circuit, there isn’t any indication that the CFPB will cease there. The CFPB seems centered on vastly increasing the scope of credit score reporting and dispute investigations that may give rise to FCRA claims in opposition to furnishers underneath Part 1681s-2(b). The final word consequence might be the creation of a break up between federal circuits that undertake the CFPB’s place (increasing enforcement to authorized disputes) and people that don’t (limiting civil enforcement to factual inaccuracies).
• State-Regulation Preemption. In an interpretive rule revealed in June (hyperlink), the CFPB additionally took the place that the scope of FCRA preemption of state legal guidelines is “slim” and “focused.” Part 1681t of the FCRA typically supplies that the FCRA preempts inconsistent state legal guidelines, and federal courts have lengthy relied on that part to carry that state legislation claims overlaying the identical material as is regulated by the FCRA are preempted. In its new rule, nevertheless, the CFPB confirms its perception that state can—and may—move legal guidelines which are extra strict than the FCRA, and even goes so far as to recommend that state legislation prohibitions on sure credit score reporting (as an example, barring the reporting of medical debt, evictions, or rental arrears) wouldn’t be preempted. Whereas the brand new rule could result in extra state-level regulation of the credit score reporting trade, it stays to be seen how—or if—courts will change their interpretation of FCRA preemption in gentle of the CFPB’s interpretation.
• “Permissible Goal.” In an advisory opinion launched this month (hyperlink), the CFPB most lately turned its focus to the “permissible function” requirement in Part 1681b of the FCRA. Part 1681b lists the circumstances wherein a shopper reporting company could present a credit score report back to person of knowledge, and wherein a person could request a report from a shopper reporting company, together with when the person has a “permissible function” to request the report (as an example, when the person “intends to make use of the data in reference to a credit score transaction involving the buyer”). With regard to shopper reporting companies, the CFPB’s opinion imposes additional obligations by stating that an company violates the “permissible function” provision if its poor procedures consequence within the company offering details about the fallacious shopper. Equally, with regard to customers, the CFPB took the exceptional step of rejecting the “motive to consider” customary utilized by courts to find out whether or not the person had a “permissible function,” which is a standard protection to FCRA legal responsibility within the context of identification theft claims. This opinion probably broadens the scope of FCRA legal responsibility by imposing “strict prohibitions” on shopper reporting companies and customers of knowledge, although solely time will inform whether or not courts observe the CFPB’s steerage.

Mid-Yr Takeaways

The CFPB has confirmed its concentrate on the FCRA at every flip all through the first-half of 2022. The widespread thread throughout the CFPB’s steerage has been heighted obligations—narrowing state legislation preemption and broadening investigation and permissible function obligations. Shopper reporting companies, furnishers, and customers of knowledge might be sensible to proceed monitoring the CFPB’s exercise as a result of the CFPB is certain to proceed issuing FCRA steerage all through 2022 and into 2023. Nonetheless, whereas the CFPB’s steerage might be related to regulatory compliance underneath the present CFPB regime, it stays to be seen whether or not courts deciphering the FCRA will associate with the CFPB’s steerage. In every of the situations recognized on this article, doing so would require courts to interrupt from long-standing precedent, which might take time and lead to circuit splits that serve solely to extend uncertainty and litigation prices.

[View supply.]